Reading the internal control: what RNase P tells you
A co-amplified RNase P (RPP30) internal control reports more than a passing run, how to read it, and what it flags when a result comes back negative.
QC note · Healthincode · SARS CoV 2 RNaseP Kit
Method & sample types
The Healthincode SARS CoV 2 RNaseP Kit co-amplifies the SARS-CoV-2 target alongside human RNase P (gene RPP30), a human housekeeping gene present in any adequately collected respiratory swab. Because RNase P amplifies from human cellular material rather than from the pathogen itself, its signal is a direct read on sample adequacy and extraction/amplification performance, not just a generic reagent control.
Controls & interpretation
A valid negative result requires the RNase P channel to amplify: if it does, a negative SARS-CoV-2 channel can be reported with confidence that the sample actually contained human material and that extraction and amplification worked. If RNase P fails to amplify, the run is invalid regardless of the SARS-CoV-2 result, this most often reflects a poorly collected swab (too little cellular material), extraction failure, or PCR inhibition, and the correct action is to request a repeat sample or repeat the extraction, not to report the SARS-CoV-2 channel as a true negative.
Workflow integration
Building the adequacy check into the same reaction as the pathogen target, rather than as a separate process control, means every single sample gets its own individual adequacy read, not just a batch-level control. For high-volume testing, this materially reduces false-negative risk from poor swab technique without adding a separate assay or well to the workflow.
Products this note applies to
Request a quote or open the product page for the full specification and documentation.
Browse all products